Buy vs Build in Grant Management
When organisations plan new grant management systems, one question surfaces time and again: should we buy a proven solution, or build one on existing platforms?
Clear policy direction
Governments across Europe have set out strong guidance on this choice. In the UK, the Technology Code of Practice emphasises buying commodity software where it exists, and only building bespoke solutions when there is a clear need. EU and national digital strategies take a similar stance, highlighting interoperability, standards, and cost-effectiveness.
Why build is tempting
With platforms such as Microsoft Power Platform, Oracle Fusion, Workday, SAP, or ServiceNow already in place, building grant processes onto them can appear attractive. These platforms are licensed, widely adopted, and marketed as low-code environments that promise speed and flexibility.
The challenges of building
But experience shows that extending enterprise platforms into full lifecycle grant management brings risk:
- Complex governance and release management overheads
- Weaker user experience for external applicants and reviewers
- Projects that grow in scope and cost over time
- Gaps in meeting the sector-specific compliance and audit needs of funders
The case for buying
Specialist GMS platforms like AIMS are built for the complete grant lifecycle — from call design and application, through review and award, to payments and monitoring. They deliver quicker implementations, lower long-term risk, and sector-specific functionality out of the box.
Not buy or build, but buy and align
Buying doesn’t mean abandoning platforms. The right approach is often to buy and integrate: adopting a specialist GMS as the system of record for grants, while aligning with enterprise finance, HR, and analytics systems already in place.
AIMS’ position
With over 30 years in the grant management market, AIMS combines the strengths of a proven, configurable solution with the ability to align to broader digital strategies. For funders, this means:
- Confidence in a system designed for grants
- Flexibility to configure to unique programmes
- Alignment with enterprise IT investments
- Compliance with UK and European digital standards
For organisations weighing buy vs build, the evidence and policy direction point the same way: buy and align. And AIMS is designed to deliver exactly that.
-
Compliance Across the Grant Management Landscape: Different Sectors, Different Challenges
Compliance in grant management isn’t one-size-fits-all. While public funders face statutory regulations like the AI Act, Data Act, or Procurement Act, other grantmakers — from medical charities to family foundations — operate under different governance, ethical, and regulatory pressures. Understanding these variations is key when selecting or configuring a grant management system (GMS). Education & […]
-
Compliance Beyond the Public Sector: Challenges for Research, NGOs and International Development
When we think about compliance in grant management, most attention falls on public sector obligations like the AI Act, Data Act, Procurement Act, or NIS2. But for research councils, charities, and international development agencies, sector-specific compliance frameworks are just as critical — and sometimes more complex. Research Sector NGOs & Charities International Development Cross-Cutting Themes […]
-
Reliability by Design: How AIMS Stayed Online When Others Went Down
In recent months, major outages have been reported across some of the world’s leading cloud platforms, including Azure and AWS, affecting thousands of organisations worldwide. Systems went offline, websites froze, and essential grant workflows were disrupted — reminding everyone how dependent modern operations have become on large-scale cloud providers. At AIMS, we took note — […]
-
Future-Proofing Compliance in Grant Management: What Funders Need to Know for 2025–2027
Compliance, particularly in the Public Sector, is no longer a background task. For funders in the UK and EU, regulations around artificial intelligence, data, procurement, accessibility, and cybersecurity are reshaping how grant management systems (GMS) must be designed, delivered, and governed. Choosing the right system today is about future-proofing for tomorrow’s obligations. Artificial Intelligence Act […]
-
Making End-of-Year Reporting Easier for Grantmakers
As we enter Q4, grantmaking organisations everywhere are busy compiling reports, analysing outcomes, and preparing for annual reviews. End-of-year grant management reporting can be one of the most time-consuming parts of the grant cycle, but it’s also one of the most valuable. It’s the moment when data turns into insight, helping funders measure impact, identify […]
-
Beyond Features: How Process Scope Shapes a Successful GMS Tender
When grantmaking organisations begin looking for a new Grant Management System (GMS), the starting point is often a long list of functional requirements. Features matter, of course – from online applications to reviewer portals and reporting dashboards. But experience shows that it’s the process scope – the way applications are received, reviewed, approved, paid, and monitored – […]
