Beyond Features: How Process Scope Shapes a Successful GMS Tender
When grantmaking organisations begin looking for a new Grant Management System (GMS), the starting point is often a long list of functional requirements. Features matter, of course – from online applications to reviewer portals and reporting dashboards. But experience shows that it’s the process scope – the way applications are received, reviewed, approved, paid, and monitored – that often determines whether a system succeeds.
Over the past 30 years, we’ve worked with funders across research, culture, health, and the public sector. A consistent challenge we see is that tenders and RFPs tend to under-specify areas such as workflows, volumes, integrations, compliance, and future growth. This can lead to unclear expectations during procurement or gaps in delivery once a system is in place
To help address this, we’ve created a free Implementation Scope Questionnaire. It’s designed as a practical tool that any grantmaker can use to:
- Map current and future processes in more detail.
- Clarify volumes, workflows, and resourcing needs.
- Anticipate configuration, governance, and adoption issues.
- Write clearer, more complete tender documents.
The questionnaire covers core areas such as application workflows, review processes, monitoring and evaluation, claims and payments, reporting, accessibility, compliance, and even AI readiness. It goes beyond a “feature tick list” to prompt deeper thinking about how your organisation works today, and how you want it to evolve.
Whether or not you are planning to issue a tender, this resource can help you better understand your needs and have more productive conversations with potential partners.
Download the free GMS Implementation Scope
By including process scope alongside functional requirements, grantmakers can ensure their tenders set the stage for stronger partnerships, smoother implementations, and systems that genuinely support their mission.
-
Grantmaking 101: Assessment Panels, Scoring and Moderation
Assessment isn’t really about giving applications a score. It’s about making good funding decisions. Good assessment means applying published criteria consistently, considering evidence fairly and making decisions that can be explained with confidence.
-
Grantmaking 101: What Makes a Good Grant Programme?
Good grant programmes do not start with software. They start with clarity. This Grantmaking 101 article explores the foundations of effective grant programme design.
-
EU Tech Sovereignty: Why It Matters for Grant Management in 2025 and Beyond
EU tech sovereignty is reshaping how organisations think about data, compliance, AI, and digital resilience. For grant-makers, it raises important questions about control, transparency, audit trails, and the systems used to manage public and organisational funding.
-
Grantmaking 101: Standardisation vs Flexibility in Grantmaking
Should grantmakers standardise their processes or allow flexibility across programmes? This article explores how organisations can balance governance, efficiency and consistency with the need for programme-specific design in modern grantmaking.
-
Grantmaking 101: What is a shared grant management service?
Grant programmes rarely sit neatly in one place. Across government, local authorities and public bodies, different teams often manage different funding schemes with their own processes, systems and reporting requirements. But while grant programmes may vary in purpose, many of the core grant management activities are fundamentally the same.
A shared grant management service provides a common foundation for managing multiple grant programmes through shared systems, governance controls and operational processes. Rather than forcing every scheme into a single rigid model, a well-designed shared service standardises the areas that should remain consistent — such as audit trails, reporting, approvals and applicant registration — while still allowing flexibility for different policy objectives and funding models.
For organisations managing grants at scale, shared grant management services can improve governance, reduce duplication, strengthen reporting and create a more consistent experience for applicants and administrators alike.
-
How Manual Grant Processes Slow Teams Down
Manual grant management processes can quietly slow down entire organisations. From spreadsheets and email chains to reporting delays and compliance risks, disconnected workflows create inefficiencies that impact teams, applicants, and leadership alike. This article explores the hidden operational costs of manual grant administration and why more organisations are moving toward modern grant management software.
