Compliance Beyond the Public Sector: Challenges for Research, NGOs and International Development
When we think about compliance in grant management, most attention falls on public sector obligations like the AI Act, Data Act, Procurement Act, or NIS2. But for research councils, charities, and international development agencies, sector-specific compliance frameworks are just as critical — and sometimes more complex.
Research Sector
- Framework programme rules: Initiatives like Horizon Europe require cascade funding (FSTP) controls, eligibility checks, and multi-tier reporting.
- Open Science & FAIR data: Funders must ensure research outputs are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable — driving integrations with repositories and metadata capture.
- National funder policies: Bodies like UKRI, NWO and DFG mandate ORCID IDs, open access, and equality, diversity & inclusion (EDI) monitoring.
- Research integrity: Ethics approvals, conflicts of interest, and export-control checks must be built into workflows.
NGOs & Charities
- Fundraising compliance: In the UK, the Fundraising Regulator’s Code of Practice sets governance expectations.
- Charity Commission/OSCR reporting: Fund accounting requires transparency between restricted and unrestricted funds.
- Safeguarding: Especially in youth, education, or humanitarian contexts, safeguarding checks and evidence logs are essential.
- Donor-imposed compliance: Major foundations often impose bespoke reporting and audit requirements.
International Development
- IATI reporting: Bilateral and multilateral donors increasingly require reporting to the International Aid Transparency Initiative standard.
- AML/CTF checks: Screening against sanctions lists and ensuring financial traceability are vital in fragile states.
- Safeguarding & protection policies: Agencies such as FCDO mandate strict safeguarding standards and evidence of compliance.
- Cross-border data protection: GDPR and Schrems II make hosting and transfer choices critical when handling beneficiary data.
Cross-Cutting Themes
Across these sectors, three compliance themes stand out:
- Data sovereignty and security — ensuring sensitive data is managed lawfully and transparently.
- Equity, diversity & inclusion (EDI) — increasingly central to reporting and accountability.
- ESG and social value — funders are being asked to evidence the broader impact of their grantmaking.
At AIMS, we design grant management systems that are configurable to these diverse compliance needs — from IATI reporting in international development, to EDI data capture in research, to safeguarding logs for charities. Future-proofing isn’t just about regulation; it’s about aligning with sector realities.
-
Grantmaking 101: Standardisation vs Flexibility in Grantmaking
Should grantmakers standardise their processes or allow flexibility across programmes? This article explores how organisations can balance governance, efficiency and consistency with the need for programme-specific design in modern grantmaking.
-
Grantmaking 101: What is a shared grant management service?
Grant programmes rarely sit neatly in one place. Across government, local authorities and public bodies, different teams often manage different funding schemes with their own processes, systems and reporting requirements. But while grant programmes may vary in purpose, many of the core grant management activities are fundamentally the same.
A shared grant management service provides a common foundation for managing multiple grant programmes through shared systems, governance controls and operational processes. Rather than forcing every scheme into a single rigid model, a well-designed shared service standardises the areas that should remain consistent — such as audit trails, reporting, approvals and applicant registration — while still allowing flexibility for different policy objectives and funding models.
For organisations managing grants at scale, shared grant management services can improve governance, reduce duplication, strengthen reporting and create a more consistent experience for applicants and administrators alike.
-
How Manual Grant Processes Slow Teams Down
Manual grant management processes can quietly slow down entire organisations. From spreadsheets and email chains to reporting delays and compliance risks, disconnected workflows create inefficiencies that impact teams, applicants, and leadership alike. This article explores the hidden operational costs of manual grant administration and why more organisations are moving toward modern grant management software.
-
Digital Sovereignty in Grant Management: Why Control, Resilience and Deployment Choice Matter
Digital sovereignty in grant management is becoming a critical priority for public sector and research organisations. As requirements around data control, security, and deployment flexibility increase, grantmakers must ensure their systems can meet evolving regulatory and operational demands.
-
Grant Management Software: A Practical Checklist for Organisations
Learn how grant management software can improve funding tracking, reduce admin, and ensure compliance with this practical checklist for organisations.
-
One Platform, Many Programmes: Scaling Multi-Agency Grant Administration with a Single Grant Management System
How can multiple agencies collaborate effectively when managing shared funding programmes? This article explores how a multi-agency grant management platform can centralise applications, evaluations, reporting and oversight, enabling organisations to coordinate funding programmes more efficiently and transparently.
