Compliance Across the Grant Management Landscape: Different Sectors, Different Challenges
Compliance in grant management isn’t one-size-fits-all. While public funders face statutory regulations like the AI Act, Data Act, or Procurement Act, other grantmakers — from medical charities to family foundations — operate under different governance, ethical, and regulatory pressures. Understanding these variations is key when selecting or configuring a grant management system (GMS).
Education & Cultural Funders
Universities, academies, and arts councils must navigate state aid and subsidy control rules, intellectual property rights, and diversity monitoring. Safeguarding is also central when children and young people are involved.
Health & Medical Research Charities
Medical funders handle highly sensitive data. Compliance spans clinical trials regulation, GDPR protections for health data, conflict-of-interest management, and transparency with patient involvement standards.
Corporate & CSR Grantmakers
Corporate foundations must demonstrate ESG reporting, align with anti-bribery/anti-corruption laws, and manage tax compliance around charitable giving. Reputational risk monitoring is often a hidden but vital requirement.
Faith-Based Grantmakers
Faith-based organisations face compliance with charity law, political activity restrictions, safeguarding, and international AML/CTF checks when funding overseas projects.
Private & Family Foundations
Often smaller but highly influential, family foundations emphasise governance, donor intent, and restricted vs. unrestricted funds. While not always legally bound to public-sector frameworks, many adopt high standards for reputational trust.
Types of Grantmaking
Beyond sectors, the type of grant also shapes compliance needs:
- Direct grants demand eligibility and fairness controls.
- Cascade funding requires sub-grant due diligence and multi-tier reporting.
- Pooled funds need interoperability across multiple donors.
- Prizes & challenges raise IP and competition law questions.
- Loans & blended finance bring financial regulation into scope.
Why It Matters
Every funder’s compliance map looks different. A robust GMS must be configurable, allowing each organisation to align workflows with its specific obligations — from safeguarding logs for charities, to FAIR data support in research, to ESG reporting for corporates.
At AIMS, our philosophy is that compliance shouldn’t be bolted on. It should be woven into the system design, flexing to meet the needs of each grantmaker.
Want to see how compliance challenges differ across your sector? Let’s start a conversation.
-
Compliance Beyond the Public Sector: Challenges for Research, NGOs and International Development
When we think about compliance in grant management, most attention falls on public sector obligations like the AI Act, Data Act, Procurement Act, or NIS2. But for research councils, charities, and international development agencies, sector-specific compliance frameworks are just as critical — and sometimes more complex. Research Sector NGOs & Charities International Development Cross-Cutting Themes […]
-
Reliability by Design: How AIMS Stayed Online When Others Went Down
In recent months, major outages have been reported across some of the world’s leading cloud platforms, including Azure and AWS, affecting thousands of organisations worldwide. Systems went offline, websites froze, and essential grant workflows were disrupted — reminding everyone how dependent modern operations have become on large-scale cloud providers. At AIMS, we took note — […]
-
Future-Proofing Compliance in Grant Management: What Funders Need to Know for 2025–2027
Compliance, particularly in the Public Sector, is no longer a background task. For funders in the UK and EU, regulations around artificial intelligence, data, procurement, accessibility, and cybersecurity are reshaping how grant management systems (GMS) must be designed, delivered, and governed. Choosing the right system today is about future-proofing for tomorrow’s obligations. Artificial Intelligence Act […]
-
Making End-of-Year Reporting Easier for Grantmakers
As we enter Q4, grantmaking organisations everywhere are busy compiling reports, analysing outcomes, and preparing for annual reviews. End-of-year grant management reporting can be one of the most time-consuming parts of the grant cycle, but it’s also one of the most valuable. It’s the moment when data turns into insight, helping funders measure impact, identify […]
-
Buy vs Build in Grant Management
When organisations plan new grant management systems, one question surfaces time and again: should we buy a proven solution, or build one on existing platforms? Clear policy direction Governments across Europe have set out strong guidance on this choice. In the UK, the Technology Code of Practice emphasises buying commodity software where it exists, and only building bespoke solutions when there […]
-
Beyond Features: How Process Scope Shapes a Successful GMS Tender
When grantmaking organisations begin looking for a new Grant Management System (GMS), the starting point is often a long list of functional requirements. Features matter, of course – from online applications to reviewer portals and reporting dashboards. But experience shows that it’s the process scope – the way applications are received, reviewed, approved, paid, and monitored – […]
